H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Robin Soderling H2H: 0-1
Robin Soderling holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2003 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Robin Soderling | 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Robin Soderling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |