H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-1
Martin Verkerk and Tim Henman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Martin Verkerk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Basel third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2003* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-2 6-3 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2002 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Martin Verkerk | (w/o) | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |