H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-0
Martin Verkerk holds a 2–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Verkerk leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Verkerk won the 2003 Roland Garros third round 5-7 6-4 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Martin Verkerk | 5-7 6-4 6-2 7-5 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| May 7, 2003* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Martin Verkerk | 6-3 7-6(2) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Martin Verkerk | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |