H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Yevgeny Kafelnikov H2H: 1-1
Martin Verkerk and Yevgeny Kafelnikov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Verkerk leads 1–0 on carpet, while Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 2003 Rome Masters quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2003* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6-3 7-5 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2003* | Milan | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Martin Verkerk | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 |