H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Martin Wostenholme vs Huub Van Boeckel H2H: 0-1

Huub Van Boeckel holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Huub Van Boeckel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Huub Van Boeckel won the 1985 Bordeaux round of 32 3-6 6-0 6-3.

CAN Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 66 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Huub Van Boeckel 3-6 6-0 6-3 Martin Wostenholme #117 Match data Sep 19, 1985* R32 Bordeaux ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Wostenholme #1,171 #84 265 1,606 44 79 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Huub Van Boeckel 1,581 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Wostenholme Huub Van Boeckel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,497 0 0
17 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
19 1982 2–1 66.7% 1,519 0 0
20 1983 0–1 0.0% #329 1,501 0 0
21 1984 2–3 40.0% #186 1,526 0 0
22 1985 4–8 33.3% #93 1,556 0 0
23 1986 9–18 33.3% #190 1,533 0 0
24 1987 2–7 22.2% #251 1,494 0 0
25 1988 3–4 42.9% #293 1,496 0 0
26 1989 6–8 42.9% #120 1,536 0 0
27 1990 10–19 34.5% #156 1,508 0 0
28 1991 6–7 46.2% #153 1,523 0 0
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #340 1,512 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Wostenholme Huub Van Boeckel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 2 1 3 66.7% 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 16 33 49 32.7% 21 36 57 36.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 11 15 26.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Wostenholme Huub Van Boeckel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 102.6 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
17 1980 1497 114.0 0.0% -4.00 -0.24
19 1982 1520 101.6 +44 55.6% 0.00 2–1 (67%) +0.70 1979 1488 93.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.08
20 1983 1502 95.8 0.0% -3.50 +0.32
21 1984 1526 113.6 +54 33.3% -0.92 2–0 1–1 -0.27
22 1985 1557 128.6 +23 -30 37.5% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.9 +0.06
23 1986 1533 126.0 -21 +67 +22 36.8% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 1–6 (14%) 96.3 +0.42 1983 1451 104.0 25.0% -0.83 0–2 0–2 +0.02
24 1987 1495 96.0 -28 +77 22.2% -2.28 0–1 -0.08 1984 1500 103.5 +60 52.2% +0.09 3–2 (60%) 0–1 +1.47
25 1988 1497 107.0 -8 38.5% -0.46 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.93 1985 1526 112.3 +11 -23 +26 37.3% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 101.0 +1.79
26 1989 1537 120.9 -67 +62 45.2% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.37
27 1990 1509 115.6 +21 +47 36.6% -1.13 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 98.1 +1.22 1987 1513 101.1 +40 28.6% -1.79 1–0 1–1 +0.54
28 1991 1523 103.7 -1.82 +1.47 1.033 50.4% -15 +33 +67 50.0% -0.30 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.29 1988 1432 91.8 14.3% -2.36 0–2 1–1 +0.67
29 1992 1512 102.2 -1.95 -1.09 0.880 48.2% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 -0.01
Career 1607 122.6 -1.83 +1.27 1.020 50.3% +2 +55 +45 37.9% -0.89 14–22 (39%) 12–22 (35%) 94.8 +3.11 1582 105.5 +19 -23 +44 34.8% -1.05 9–10 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 98.2 +8.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.