H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Martin Wostenholme vs Lawson Duncan H2H: 1-0
Martin Wostenholme holds a 1–0 lead over Lawson Duncan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Wostenholme leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Wostenholme won the 1991 Guaruja third round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1991* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Martin Wostenholme | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Lawson Duncan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lawson Duncan | #1,094 | #47 | 317 | 1,761 | 105 | 110 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Wostenholme | Lawson Duncan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #165 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #59 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #174 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #93 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #91 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |