H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Martin Wostenholme vs Mark Dickson H2H: 0-1
Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1987 Boston second round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1987* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Mark Dickson | 7-6 6-1 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Wostenholme | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |