H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Martin Wostenholme vs Marty Davis H2H: 0-1
Marty Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marty Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marty Davis won the 1988 Montreal / Toronto second round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1988* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marty Davis | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Wostenholme | Marty Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |