H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Martin Wostenholme vs Peter Fleming H2H: 0-1
Peter Fleming holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Fleming leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Peter Fleming won the 1986 Toronto Indoor third round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1986* | Toronto Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Peter Fleming | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Fleming | #933 | #8 | 0 | 2,046 | 224 | 214 | 51.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Wostenholme | Peter Fleming | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #120 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #116 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 43–31 | 58.1% | #26 | 1,953 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #13 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #99 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #32 | 1,765 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #174 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |