H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Martin Wostenholme vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-3

Tomas Smid holds a 3–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1986 Swiss Open Gstaad round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Wostenholme
CAN Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #35 4-6 6-3 6-4 Martin Wostenholme #117 Match data Jul 10, 1986* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #33 6-2 6-7 6-1 Martin Wostenholme #88 Match data May 8, 1986* R32 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #34 6-3 6-3 Martin Wostenholme Match data Aug 15, 1979* R64 Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Wostenholme #1,171 #84 265 1,606 44 79 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Wostenholme Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 2–1 66.7% — 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1983 0–1 0.0% #329 1,501 0 0 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1984 2–3 40.0% #186 1,526 0 0 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1985 4–8 33.3% #93 1,556 0 0 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1986 9–18 33.3% #190 1,533 0 0 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1987 2–7 22.2% #251 1,494 0 0 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1988 3–4 42.9% #293 1,496 0 0 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1989 6–8 42.9% #120 1,536 0 0 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 1990 10–19 34.5% #156 1,508 0 0 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 1991 6–7 46.2% #153 1,523 0 0 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #340 1,512 0 0 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Wostenholme Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 1991 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 33 49 32.7% 21 36 57 36.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Wostenholme Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 1497 114.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1520 101.6 — — — — +44 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–1 (67%) — — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 1502 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.32 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 94.4 +0.89
21 1984 1526 113.6 — — — — — +54 — 33.3% -0.92 2–0 1–1 — -0.27 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) 92.3 +1.24
22 1985 1557 128.6 — — — — +23 -30 — 37.5% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.9 +0.06 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) 105.4 +0.34
23 1986 1533 126.0 — — — — -21 +67 +22 36.8% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 1–6 (14%) 96.3 +0.42 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) 104.6 -1.69
24 1987 1495 96.0 — — — — -29 +77 — 22.2% -2.28 — 0–1 — -0.08 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -2.22
25 1988 1497 107.0 — — — — -8 — — 38.5% -0.46 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.93 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) 104.7 -1.40
26 1989 1537 120.9 — — — — -67 +62 — 45.2% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.37 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) 102.8 -0.62
27 1990 1509 115.6 — — — — +21 +47 — 36.6% -1.13 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 98.1 +1.22 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 94.2 -2.90
28 1991 1523 103.7 -1.82 +1.47 1.033 50.4% -15 +33 +68 50.0% -0.30 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.29 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) 97.7 -1.32
29 1992 1512 102.2 -1.95 -1.09 0.880 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.01 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) 103.3 +1.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) 93.3 +1.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) 100.8 -0.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 100.6 -2.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.0 +0.70
Career — 1607 122.6 -1.83 +1.27 1.020 50.3% +2 +55 +45 37.9% -0.89 14–22 (39%) 12–22 (35%) 94.8 +3.11 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.