H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Marton Fucsovics vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-1
Marton Fucsovics and Aljaz Bedene are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay, while Marton Fucsovics leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marton Fucsovics won the 2021 Eastbourne third round 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Hungary
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2021* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Marton Fucsovics | 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(3) | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| May 4, 2017* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | Marton Fucsovics | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marton Fucsovics | #78 | #31 | 1,659 | 1,992 | 167 | 176 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marton Fucsovics | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #158 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #36 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #70 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #55 | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #40 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #55 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |