H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marton Fucsovics vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Almagro holds a 1–0 lead over Marton Fucsovics in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2016 US Open first round 6-1 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Hungary
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-1 6-4 7-6(7) | Marton Fucsovics | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marton Fucsovics | #78 | #31 | 1,659 | 1,992 | 167 | 176 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marton Fucsovics | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #158 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #36 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #70 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #55 | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2021 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #40 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2022 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #55 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |