H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Marton Fucsovics vs Richard Gasquet

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marton Fucsovics vs Richard Gasquet.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marton Fucsovics
Hungary Age 34 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marton Fucsovics #88 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #133 Match data Oct 21, 2024 Q2 Q Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard
Marton Fucsovics #77 4-6 6-1 6-4 Richard Gasquet #118 Match data Feb 26, 2024 Q2 Q Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marton Fucsovics #122 #31 1,659 2,002 166 179 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marton Fucsovics Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2012 0–1 0.0% #440 1,500 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #181 1,545 0 0 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 — — — — — — — 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2015 0–2 0.0% #214 1,606 0 0 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2016 1–2 33.3% #158 1,616 0 0 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2017 5–8 38.5% #85 1,721 0 0 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2018 25–23 52.1% #36 1,818 0 1 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 2019 22–25 46.8% #70 1,769 0 1 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2020 12–11 52.2% #55 1,881 0 1 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 2021 26–24 52.0% #40 1,837 0 1 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 2022 13–18 41.9% #87 1,704 0 1 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 2023 22–20 52.4% #59 1,815 0 1 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 2024 12–17 41.4% #104 1,779 0 2 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 2025 18–11 62.1% #55 1,838 0 3 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 2026 9–16 36.0% #122 1,719 0 3 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marton Fucsovics Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2018 15 13 28 53.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2020 9 10 19 47.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2021 18 16 34 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2022 7 12 19 36.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2023 13 12 25 52.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2025 8 5 13 61.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 2026 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 108 207 47.8% 44 48 92 47.8% 23 23 46 50.0% — — — — — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 339/345 of Marton Fucsovics's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marton Fucsovics Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2012 1/1 9.0 2.0 52.3% 75.4% 55.8% 83.3% 14.3% 66.1% 34.0% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2013 2/2 5.5 4.5 58.3% 68.7% 54.6% 55.6% 43.2% 62.1% 39.9% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2015 2/2 2.0 3.5 59.0% 65.9% 45.4% 48.9% 47.2% 57.6% 33.4% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2016 3/3 2.3 4.0 52.8% 56.9% 52.6% 52.4% 42.9% 54.5% 44.2% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2017 13/13 5.3 3.8 54.5% 74.3% 51.7% 56.9% 41.4% 64.4% 41.8% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2018 47/48 4.3 3.4 55.3% 70.7% 52.5% 61.5% 43.2% 62.6% 40.0% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 2019 46/47 4.1 3.7 58.0% 70.1% 49.7% 53.6% 41.0% 61.5% 38.6% 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 2020 23/23 4.1 2.8 58.6% 63.6% 48.3% 56.3% 44.9% 57.6% 39.7% 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 2021 49/50 4.3 3.9 59.6% 70.5% 51.7% 60.8% 44.2% 62.9% 38.7% 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 2022 31/31 4.4 3.9 61.4% 70.5% 51.1% 58.1% 36.3% 62.7% 35.6% 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 2023 41/42 4.3 3.7 59.1% 71.6% 52.0% 56.1% 43.4% 63.5% 37.8% 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 2024 28/29 5.1 2.1 63.4% 70.8% 52.7% 57.7% 42.1% 64.6% 37.6% 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 2025 28/29 3.8 2.7 60.4% 73.1% 49.3% 53.1% 42.1% 63.5% 40.4% 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 2026 25/25 4.2 4.2 61.0% 69.8% 48.8% 50.6% 31.6% 61.6% 34.1% 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 339/345 4.3 3.5 59.0% 70.3% 51.0% 56.9% 41.4% 62.4% 38.4% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marton Fucsovics Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 2010 1462 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35
19 2011 1459 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52
20 2012 1501 102.7 -0.05 -2.56 1.001 50.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.13 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51
21 2013 1546 111.9 +0.02 -0.43 1.053 51.1% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61
22 2014 1552 109.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90
23 2015 1607 108.8 -1.06 -2.66 0.788 45.6% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — -0.01 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85
24 2016 1617 113.1 -2.72 +1.91 0.971 49.1% — — — 33.3% -0.67 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00
25 2017 1721 131.1 +0.48 +3.62 1.175 53.2% -16 -114 — 38.7% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.50 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44
26 2018 1818 149.7 -0.86 +2.95 1.070 51.2% -9 -125 -201 55.1% +0.38 5–9 (36%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.31 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77
27 2019 1770 155.0 -1.58 +2.30 1.001 49.9% +28 -49 -107 50.0% +0.03 7–12 (37%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.52 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10
28 2020 1882 150.7 -2.60 +2.52 0.937 48.7% -27 -100 — 53.0% +0.03 3–1 (75%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.50 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40
29 2021 1837 153.6 -0.03 +2.49 1.044 50.7% +8 -86 -41 50.0% +0.22 12–9 (57%) 13–17 (43%) — -3.08 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22
30 2022 1705 136.5 -0.99 -0.31 0.956 49.2% -1 +44 +74 46.1% -0.25 5–7 (42%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.16 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59
31 2023 1815 144.4 +0.37 +2.05 1.037 50.6% -54 -48 +71 51.7% +0.06 9–8 (53%) 8–9 (47%) — -1.86 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72
32 2024 1779 151.0 +0.56 +1.58 1.061 51.2% -23 +29 — 47.2% -0.01 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.92 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58
33 2025 1838 135.6 -0.36 +3.24 1.107 51.5% -28 -72 +72 55.4% +0.39 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.71 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68
34 2026 1719 132.9 -1.69 -0.58 0.889 48.0% +4 -8 +140 39.0% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.84 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 2002 147.6 -0.68 +1.96 1.021 50.3% -9 -54 +9 49.5% +0.04 53–66 (45%) 69–77 (47%) 95.7 -4.08 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.