H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marton Fucsovics vs Thiago Monteiro H2H: 2-0
Marton Fucsovics holds a 2–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marton Fucsovics leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marton Fucsovics won the 2020 Roland Garros third round 7-5 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Hungary
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Marton Fucsovics | 7-5 6-1 6-3 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| May 3, 2019* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marton Fucsovics | 6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marton Fucsovics | #78 | #31 | 1,659 | 1,992 | 167 | 176 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marton Fucsovics | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #158 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #36 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #70 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #55 | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #40 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #55 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |