H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marty Davis vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 3-2
Marty Davis holds a 3–2 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marty Davis leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Marty Davis won the 1987 Washington third round 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1987* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marty Davis | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-3 7-5 | Marty Davis | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1982* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marty Davis | 6-3 7-5 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1981* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marty Davis | 6-3 7-5 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1981* | Maui | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-1 | Marty Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marty Davis | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |