H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marty Davis vs Chip Hooper H2H: 1-0
Marty Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Chip Hooper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marty Davis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marty Davis won the 1985 Brisbane fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1985* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marty Davis | 6-2 6-1 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marty Davis | Chip Hooper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |