H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marty Davis vs Jim Delaney H2H: 0-1

Jim Delaney holds a 1–0 lead over Marty Davis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Delaney leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Delaney won the 1982 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 64 3-6 7-6 6-4.

USA Age 67 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 73 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Delaney 3-6 7-6 6-4 Marty Davis #93 Match data Jul 14, 1982* R64 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marty Davis #811 #47 158 1,797 151 173 46.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jim Delaney #262 #64 0 1,678 78 131 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marty Davis Jim Delaney
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1978 0–1 0.0% #301 1,483 0 0 1972 1–5 16.7% 1,453 0 0
20 1973 4–5 44.4% #159 1,535 0 0
21 1974 9–7 56.2% #109 1,589 0 0
22 1981 14–18 43.8% 1,605 0 0 1975 10–14 41.7% #73 1,647 0 0
23 1982 16–22 42.1% #99 1,581 0 0 1976 20–29 40.8% #64 1,633 0 0
24 1983 10–11 47.6% #84 1,611 0 0 1977 16–27 37.2% #74 1,624 0 0
25 1984 25–19 56.8% #64 1,733 0 1 1978 0–2 0.0% #418 1,602 0 0
26 1985 20–19 51.3% #63 1,710 0 3 1979 2–9 18.2% #276 1,521 0 0
27 1986 21–25 45.7% #89 1,627 0 3 1980 2–5 28.6% #269 1,512 0 0
28 1987 16–17 48.5% #96 1,652 0 3 1981 11–21 34.4% 1,514 0 0
29 1988 20–25 44.4% #95 1,652 0 3 1982 3–7 30.0% 1,513 0 0
30 1989 9–14 39.1% #143 1,618 0 3
31 1990 0–2 0.0% #507 1,590 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marty Davis Jim Delaney
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 1981 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1982 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1976 12 9 21 57.1% 4 12 16 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 4 8 12 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9%
25 1984 13 9 22 59.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1986 10 11 21 47.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1987 13 10 23 56.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 2 7 9 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1988 13 15 28 46.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1989 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 77 85 162 47.5% 17 26 43 39.5% 28 27 55 50.9% 29 35 64 45.3% 23 39 62 37.1% 23 47 70 32.9% 16 20 36 44.4% 16 25 41 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marty Davis Jim Delaney
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1978 1484 98.0 0.0% -3.00 +0.21 1972 1453 97.8 +87 31.3% -1.13 0–2 3–1 (75%) +0.33
20 1973 1535 115.9 +29 43.5% -0.04 1–1 1–3 (25%) -0.95
21 1974 1590 115.9 +3 -44 -43 51.2% +0.15 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) +1.56
22 1981 1606 128.1 +35 -73 -29 45.5% -0.23 5–9 (36%) 8–8 (50%) +1.65 1975 1648 130.0 -58 -15 40.7% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 5–2 (71%) -1.20
23 1982 1582 128.9 +41 -67 -7 44.9% -0.02 2–8 (20%) 3–12 (20%) +2.20 1976 1633 124.0 +10 -63 -67 40.3% -0.51 9–7 (56%) 5–11 (31%) +2.59
24 1983 1612 119.4 -14 +24 47.1% -0.06 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) +1.74 1977 1625 131.3 +11 -87 -49 41.1% -0.61 9–11 (45%) 3–5 (38%) -0.92
25 1984 1733 133.2 -28 -224 +11 52.7% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 9–11 (45%) +2.05 1978 1602 98.4 0.0% -4.50 -0.03
26 1985 1711 137.6 +1 -217 +64 51.6% +0.25 5–7 (42%) 5–13 (28%) +0.65 1979 1521 100.2 +41 -40 +50 25.9% -1.41 1–3 (25%) 0–2 +0.72
27 1986 1628 131.4 +20 -86 +76 48.7% +0.07 8–12 (40%) 13–12 (52%) +0.70 1980 1513 116.6 +44 35.3% -0.65 1–2 (33%) 3–4 (43%) +0.36
28 1987 1653 132.7 +29 -104 +23 49.4% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 11–11 (50%) +0.33 1981 1514 115.6 -18 -33 +92 42.4% -0.82 3–10 (23%) 10–4 (71%) +1.04
29 1988 1653 130.5 +16 -106 -2 46.3% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) -0.96 1982 1514 105.2 -10 31.8% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) 0.00
30 1989 1619 125.3 +40 43.8% -0.33 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) -0.42
31 1990 1591 103.8 33.3% -0.67 0–2 1–1 -0.03
Career 1798 136.0 +15 -116 +17 47.8% -0.03 46–66 (41%) 69–88 (44%) 92.6 +2.51 1678 125.3 +4 -38 +3 40.0% -0.67 33–44 (43%) 36–37 (49%) 102.3 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.