H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marty Davis vs Jim Gurfein H2H: 1-0
Marty Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Gurfein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marty Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marty Davis won the 1984 US Open first round 4-6 6-2 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Marty Davis | 4-6 6-2 6-4 6-1 | Jim Gurfein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Gurfein | #736 | #96 | 0 | 1,678 | 39 | 64 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marty Davis | Jim Gurfein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #219 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #159 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #96 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #208 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #321 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |