H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marty Davis vs Van Winitsky H2H: 0-1
Van Winitsky holds a 1–0 lead over Marty Davis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1981 Hong Kong semifinal 7-5 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1981* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Van Winitsky | 7-5 6-7 6-3 | Marty Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marty Davis | Van Winitsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |