H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Massimo Cierro vs Raul Antonio Viver H2H: 1-0
Massimo Cierro holds a 1–0 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Massimo Cierro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Massimo Cierro won the 1989 San Marino fourth round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1989* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Massimo Cierro | 6-4 7-6 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo Cierro | #1,295 | #113 | 295 | 1,535 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Massimo Cierro | Raul Antonio Viver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #202 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #220 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |