H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mate Pavic vs Go Soeda

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Mate Pavic vs Go Soeda.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mate Pavic
CRO Age 33 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Go Soeda
JPN Age 41 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Go Soeda #90 7-6(4) 6-1 Mate Pavic #405 Match data Jun 21, 2015 Q2 Q Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mate Pavic #974 #295 150 1,607 3 10 23.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Go Soeda #683 #47 888 1,709 29 78 27.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mate Pavic Go Soeda
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #835 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 2–2 50.0% #369 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 0–3 0.0% #412 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 1–2 33.3% #423 1,578 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #302 1,484 0 0
21 2015 0–1 0.0% #638 1,525 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,462 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #206 1,488 0 0
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #933 1,538 0 0 2008 1–3 25.0% #114 1,478 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2009 0–3 0.0% #238 1,498 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2010 1–4 20.0% #120 1,474 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2011 3–7 30.0% #120 1,566 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2012 10–17 37.0% #60 1,631 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2013 6–15 28.6% #103 1,701 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2014 1–3 25.0% #99 1,581 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 6–12 33.3% #132 1,653 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #126 1,644 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 0–3 0.0% #150 1,603 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2019 1–1 50.0% #121 1,594 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #133 1,585 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mate Pavic Go Soeda
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 12 17 29.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — 24 58 82 29.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/13 of Mate Pavic's and 106/107 of Go Soeda's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mate Pavic Go Soeda
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 1/1 0.0 2.0 50.9% 53.6% 33.3% 28.6% 33.3% 43.6% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/4 5.7 2.3 67.2% 70.3% 50.2% 85.7% 66.7% 63.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 3/3 2.3 2.7 57.0% 53.5% 47.4% 43.9% 43.3% 51.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 3/3 12.3 3.0 66.7% 70.3% 41.6% 63.3% 50.0% 61.0% 26.4% 2005 2/2 5.0 4.0 57.5% 63.4% 54.6% 47.2% 71.4% 59.6% 29.6%
21 2015 1/1 3.0 0.0 69.4% 70.0% 50.0% 40.0% 16.7% 63.9% 32.5% 2006 2/2 1.5 3.5 51.2% 59.3% 43.3% 51.4% 50.0% 50.9% 27.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 2.3 2.3 58.2% 66.5% 47.4% 45.5% 27.8% 58.6% 27.7%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 47.1% 62.5% 22.2% 33.3% — 41.2% 15.8% 2008 4/4 2.5 1.8 59.6% 70.7% 42.3% 54.2% 35.8% 59.5% 35.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 1.3 4.3 58.7% 62.1% 39.3% 48.4% 71.4% 52.5% 29.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 5/5 3.2 3.4 52.7% 66.1% 48.6% 62.2% 20.2% 57.8% 34.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 10/10 2.5 3.3 51.9% 61.1% 48.1% 53.8% 24.1% 54.6% 31.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 26/27 3.1 2.7 52.6% 67.5% 49.8% 46.3% 43.3% 59.1% 37.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 21/21 3.8 2.9 56.6% 68.8% 46.3% 48.9% 42.5% 59.2% 32.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 4/4 2.3 2.5 60.1% 65.9% 38.4% 49.5% 33.3% 54.8% 41.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 18/18 2.3 2.1 57.2% 68.7% 47.8% 53.8% 25.3% 59.9% 32.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 4.0 1.0 63.2% 73.3% 48.6% 55.6% 16.7% 64.2% 30.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 3/3 2.7 1.0 56.6% 63.5% 48.8% 41.3% 55.0% 56.9% 28.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 5.0 2.5 54.0% 72.6% 48.7% 70.8% 37.5% 61.4% 27.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 3.5 3.0 60.6% 62.2% 58.5% 47.8% 12.5% 60.8% 22.7%
Career — 12/13 5.4 2.3 61.7% 64.0% 43.6% 56.7% 44.2% 56.3% 31.1% — 106/107 3.0 2.7 55.5% 66.9% 47.5% 50.6% 36.9% 58.3% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mate Pavic Go Soeda
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1480 101.1 +1.17 -6.25 0.591 39.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1486 104.6 -0.26 -1.09 0.999 51.4% — — — 66.7% +0.83 — 1–1 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1459 108.1 -1.71 -1.14 0.701 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1579 103.6 -1.43 -4.51 0.676 46.6% — — +169 42.9% -0.43 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.24 2005 1485 101.8 -0.40 -1.85 0.733 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–0 — -0.24
21 2015 1525 105.4 -1.95 -1.64 0.901 47.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16 2006 1463 107.8 -1.06 +0.75 0.560 39.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.25
22 2016 1516 104.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1488 103.9 -0.94 -1.36 0.668 44.0% +11 — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 — — -0.32
23 2017 1538 100.7 -0.48 -3.72 0.268 27.8% — — — — — — — — -0.05 2008 1478 108.0 -1.73 +0.50 0.872 48.4% +13 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.03
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1499 109.9 -3.20 -0.53 0.617 42.3% +9 — — 14.3% -2.29 0–1 — — +0.01
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1474 106.1 -1.99 -0.82 0.815 46.4% — — +51 16.7% -2.08 1–0 0–1 — +0.18
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1567 116.3 -3.91 -2.57 0.689 43.7% 0 — — 26.9% -2.08 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.17
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1631 134.7 -2.57 +0.96 0.928 48.5% +24 — -97 39.4% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.30
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1701 130.6 -3.36 -2.47 0.791 46.1% +14 — — 30.9% -1.27 3–2 (60%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.77
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1581 111.3 -0.66 +0.64 0.926 48.3% +29 — — 22.2% -1.44 — 0–1 — 0.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1653 131.9 -2.99 -1.11 0.813 46.3% -4 -213 — 32.6% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1645 110.7 +1.28 +0.72 0.860 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1604 109.6 -1.95 -3.50 0.662 44.4% +17 — — 0.0% -2.14 — 0–2 — +0.31
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1554 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1594 128.8 +2.61 +3.04 0.709 45.8% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1586 113.3 -0.77 +0.65 0.578 42.8% — — — 16.7% -2.34 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1510 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1452 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1608 106.8 -0.96 -2.65 0.711 44.6% — — +169 33.3% -1.13 0–2 3–4 (43%) — +0.50 — 1709 124.4 -2.51 -0.78 0.803 46.3% +12 -213 -53 29.7% -1.30 13–16 (45%) 17–22 (44%) 99.8 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.