H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 2-2

Mats Wilander and Bill Scanlon are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 2–0 on carpet, while Mats Wilander leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1984 US Open third round 7-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 1984* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mats Wilander #4 7-6 7-5 6-3 Bill Scanlon #19 Match data
Feb 4, 1983* Philadelphia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Bill Scanlon #71 6-4 2-6 6-2 Mats Wilander #7 Match data
Sep 2, 1982* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mats Wilander #14 6-4 6-3 6-1 Bill Scanlon #38 Match data
Nov 22, 1981* Bangkok ATP 250 F Carpet Bill Scanlon #39 6-2 6-3 Mats Wilander #283 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,017 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Bill Scanlon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 — — — — — — —
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,651 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,723 0 0
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,764 0 1
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,839 0 2
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,808 0 2
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,879 0 5
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,852 0 6
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,923 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,828 0 6
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,668 0 6
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,534 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,598 0 7