H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 1-2

Carl Uwe Steeb holds a 2–1 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Carl Uwe Steeb leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1990 Brisbane third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 27, 1990* Brisbane ATP 250 R32 Hard Carl Uwe Steeb #42 6-2 6-3 Mats Wilander #67 Match data
Jan 13, 1990* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 SF Hard Carl Uwe Steeb #16 6-3 6-2 Mats Wilander #14 Match data
May 12, 1988* Rome Masters 1000 R32 Clay Mats Wilander #2 6-4 4-6 6-3 Carl Uwe Steeb #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,920 189 190 49.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Carl Uwe Steeb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,615 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1988 19–18 51.4% #73 1,680 0 0
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,857 0 1
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,711 0 1
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,745 0 2
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1992 31–24 56.4% #29 1,787 0 2
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,718 0 2
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,607 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,660 0 3
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 — — — — — — —
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 — — — — — — —
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 — — — — — — —