H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Cassio Motta H2H: 5-0

Mats Wilander holds a 5–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 5–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1987 Italian Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Cassio Motta
BRA Age 66 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mats Wilander #4 6-3 6-2 Cassio Motta #73 Match data May 16, 1987* R16 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Mats Wilander #4 7-6 6-2 Cassio Motta #116 Match data May 15, 1985* R64 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Mats Wilander #6 7-6 3-6 6-0 Cassio Motta #99 Match data Apr 8, 1983* R16 Lisbon ATP 250 Clay
Mats Wilander #18 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-2 Cassio Motta Match data May 28, 1982* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mats Wilander #36 7-5 6-4 Cassio Motta Match data Apr 30, 1982* R16 Madrid ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,263 526 203 72.2% 7 0 0 6 20 33
Cassio Motta #576 #48 352 1,739 105 164 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Cassio Motta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,247 2 13 — — — — — — —
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,179 3 16 1979 4–8 33.3% #109 1,485 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,097 4 19 1980 0–7 0.0% #255 1,439 0 0
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,055 4 21 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,451 0 0
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,084 4 26 1982 8–13 38.1% #86 1,540 0 0
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,180 7 32 1983 14–21 40.0% #79 1,678 0 0
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,928 7 32 1984 12–19 38.7% #107 1,617 0 0
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,897 7 33 1985 7–11 38.9% #136 1,626 0 0
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,769 7 33 1986 10–10 50.0% #49 1,667 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1987 12–17 41.4% #122 1,628 0 0
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,697 7 33 1988 7–9 43.8% #74 1,593 0 0
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,653 7 33 1989 13–16 44.8% #134 1,559 0 0
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,767 7 33 1990 10–16 38.5% #105 1,538 0 0
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,680 7 33 1991 2–8 20.0% #216 1,475 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1992 5–5 50.0% #198 1,532 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #693 1,519 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mats Wilander Cassio Motta
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 18 6 24 75.0% 34 4 38 89.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 39 2 41 95.1% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 14 2 16 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 7 1 8 87.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1985 13 4 17 76.5% 37 5 42 88.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 34 3 37 91.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 29 2 31 93.5% 17 3 20 85.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 5 11 16 31.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1989 8 5 13 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 1 10 11 9.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1990 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 3 4 7 42.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 71 257 72.4% 236 68 304 77.6% 45 16 61 73.8% 59 48 107 55.1% — 33 50 83 39.8% 55 89 144 38.2% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 13 22 40.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 107/123 of Mats Wilander's and 18/20 of Cassio Motta's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mats Wilander Cassio Motta
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 17/19 3.1 1.3 62.5% 65.8% 50.4% 54.4% 45.3% 59.1% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 9/10 3.1 2.6 61.1% 66.0% 43.5% 61.7% 36.3% 57.4% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 30/37 3.1 3.0 64.0% 65.9% 46.2% 55.9% 51.7% 58.7% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 35/39 3.1 2.1 68.9% 66.4% 45.9% 56.2% 48.2% 60.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 16/18 2.3 2.1 62.9% 66.9% 46.6% 58.3% 39.9% 59.4% 41.1% 1991 10/10 2.1 2.0 64.3% 62.8% 43.5% 51.2% 30.6% 55.2% 33.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 8/10 4.1 3.0 64.8% 68.3% 47.9% 63.3% 39.5% 61.2% 37.1%
Career — 107/729 3.0 2.3 65.0% 66.2% 46.6% 56.6% 46.5% 59.2% 38.3% — 18/269 3.0 2.4 64.5% 65.3% 45.4% 56.6% 34.5% 57.8% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mats Wilander Cassio Motta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1497 120.5 — — — — — +36 — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1663 137.2 — — — — +15 -79 -104 54.2% +0.25 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 2020 162.4 — — — — -182 +108 -398 71.9% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) — -2.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2248 172.9 — — — — -208 +33 -287 78.3% +2.21 12–2 (86%) 12–11 (52%) — -4.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 2180 167.5 — — — — -83 +62 -105 71.0% +1.24 13–3 (81%) 18–6 (75%) — -3.48 1979 1486 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 35.5% -1.26 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.65
20 1985 2098 165.1 — — — — -58 +153 -23 71.8% +1.45 13–6 (68%) 12–4 (75%) — -3.35 1980 1440 106.6 — — — — — +18 — 16.7% -1.78 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.30
21 1986 2055 160.6 — — — — +34 +96 +11 68.8% +1.29 8–3 (73%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.36 1981 1452 118.5 — — — — — +22 — 33.3% -1.17 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
22 1987 2084 170.5 — — — — +5 +137 -68 73.2% +1.66 7–3 (70%) 13–11 (54%) — -4.55 1982 1541 132.3 — — — — — +34 — 45.2% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.01
23 1988 2180 162.6 — — — — +45 +57 -195 77.7% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 15–8 (65%) — -1.42 1983 1678 136.4 — — — — -92 -123 -42 42.9% -0.93 6–9 (40%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.25
24 1989 1929 145.4 — — — — +51 +210 +61 63.3% +0.82 8–3 (73%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.07 1984 1618 130.0 — — — — -81 +2 +67 45.1% -0.33 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.17
25 1990 1897 152.5 — — — — +39 +195 — 59.3% +0.72 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -2.18 1985 1626 134.0 — — — — -100 +47 — 44.2% -0.62 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.73
26 1991 1769 129.1 -0.51 -2.42 0.841 46.9% +151 +167 — 50.0% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.37 1986 1668 121.5 — — — — -132 +54 — 49.0% -0.16 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.30
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1629 126.7 — — — — -92 +60 — 40.5% -0.66 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.39
28 1993 1697 115.7 -1.61 -1.46 0.836 47.1% +125 +183 — 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.40 1988 1593 113.2 — — — — -18 +31 — 48.8% -0.22 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.41
29 1994 1653 131.2 -1.73 -0.29 0.920 48.7% +76 +109 — 47.5% -0.29 7–10 (41%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.64 1989 1560 115.7 — — — — -7 +46 — 46.7% -0.29 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.16
30 1995 1768 148.4 -0.95 +2.28 0.999 49.9% +44 -65 +195 49.5% 0.00 9–3 (75%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.55 1990 1538 112.9 — — — — +42 +29 — 35.6% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.44
31 1996 1680 121.0 -1.79 +2.24 1.010 50.1% +11 +25 — 41.5% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.59 1991 1476 100.3 -2.73 -2.51 0.741 44.1% +36 +93 — 22.7% -2.05 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.60
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1533 108.7 +0.71 -1.64 0.955 50.1% +8 +23 — 45.5% -0.36 1–1 1–1 — +0.41
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1520 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.03
Career — 2263 165.2 -1.28 +0.49 0.939 48.9% -16 +94 -98 66.8% +1.13 113–55 (67%) 121–89 (58%) 105.7 -3.77 — 1740 130.1 -1.20 -2.12 0.828 46.8% -43 +21 +8 41.9% -0.65 37–55 (40%) 31–45 (41%) 96.4 +0.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.