H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mats Wilander vs Cassio Motta H2H: 5-0
Mats Wilander holds a 5–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 5–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1987 Rome fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1987* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 6-3 6-2 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| May 15, 1985* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 7-6 6-2 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1983* | Lisbon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 7-6 3-6 6-0 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| May 28, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1982* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 7-5 6-4 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mats Wilander | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |