H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Claudio Pistolesi H2H: 1-1

Mats Wilander and Claudio Pistolesi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Pistolesi won the 1988 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 16 2-6 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Claudio Pistolesi
ITA Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudio Pistolesi #154 2-6 7-6 6-2 Mats Wilander #2 Match data Apr 22, 1988* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Mats Wilander #2 6-4 6-2 Claudio Pistolesi #145 Match data Jul 24, 1986* R32 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,263 526 203 72.2% 7 0 0 6 20 33
Claudio Pistolesi #1,367 #71 436 1,665 75 109 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Claudio Pistolesi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 1985 4–3 57.1% #211 1,549 0 0
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,247 2 13 1986 7–12 36.8% #179 1,572 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,179 3 16 1987 12–13 48.0% #97 1,599 0 1
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,097 4 19 1988 12–17 41.4% #112 1,587 0 1
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,055 4 21 1989 12–11 52.2% #95 1,632 0 1
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,084 4 26 1990 8–18 30.8% #114 1,561 0 1
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,180 7 32 1991 5–13 27.8% #116 1,531 0 1
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,928 7 32 1992 9–15 37.5% #124 1,559 0 1
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,897 7 33 1993 6–7 46.2% #183 1,582 0 1
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,769 7 33 — — — — — — —
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,697 7 33 — — — — — — —
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,653 7 33 — — — — — — —
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,767 7 33 — — — — — — —
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,680 7 33 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mats Wilander Claudio Pistolesi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 18 6 24 75.0% 34 4 38 89.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1985 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
18 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 39 2 41 95.1% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 6 11 17 35.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 14 2 16 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 7 1 8 87.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1985 13 4 17 76.5% 37 5 42 88.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 34 3 37 91.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1988 29 2 31 93.5% 17 3 20 85.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 8 5 13 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1990 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 71 257 72.4% 236 68 304 77.6% 45 16 61 73.8% 59 48 107 55.1% — 2 17 19 10.5% 72 86 158 45.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mats Wilander Claudio Pistolesi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1497 120.5 — — — — — +36 — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1663 137.2 — — — — +15 -79 -104 54.2% +0.25 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.2 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 2020 162.4 — — — — -182 +108 -398 71.9% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) 103.8 -2.88 1985 1549 115.9 — — — — — +27 — 57.1% -0.14 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.50
18 1983 2248 172.9 — — — — -208 +33 -287 78.3% +2.21 12–2 (86%) 12–11 (52%) 106.4 -4.52 1986 1573 132.3 — — — — — +9 — 38.3% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.12
19 1984 2180 167.5 — — — — -83 +62 -105 71.0% +1.24 13–3 (81%) 18–6 (75%) 111.5 -3.48 1987 1599 128.9 — — — — — +40 — 43.9% -0.26 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 104.0 +0.78
20 1985 2098 165.1 — — — — -58 +153 -23 71.8% +1.45 13–6 (68%) 12–4 (75%) 101.3 -3.35 1988 1587 121.8 — — — — -106 +46 — 40.3% -0.93 6–4 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 103.5 -0.24
21 1986 2055 160.6 — — — — +34 +96 +11 68.8% +1.29 8–3 (73%) 9–6 (60%) 102.3 -1.36 1989 1633 128.7 — — — — — +44 — 52.5% +0.15 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.34
22 1987 2084 170.5 — — — — +5 +137 -68 73.2% +1.66 7–3 (70%) 13–11 (54%) 100.4 -4.55 1990 1561 120.1 — — — — -83 +75 — 33.3% -1.03 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -0.39
23 1988 2180 162.6 — — — — +45 +57 -195 77.7% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 15–8 (65%) 107.0 -1.42 1991 1532 123.7 -3.09 -0.04 0.908 47.8% -89 +93 — 36.7% -0.94 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.4 -0.54
24 1989 1929 145.4 — — — — +51 +210 +61 63.3% +0.82 8–3 (73%) 10–8 (56%) 98.2 -0.07 1992 1560 125.4 -1.95 -1.40 0.902 48.2% — +85 — 40.3% -0.52 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 99.3 +0.07
25 1990 1897 152.5 — — — — +39 +195 — 59.3% +0.72 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 -2.18 1993 1583 118.3 -0.96 -1.53 0.925 48.9% — +92 — 53.6% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.3 +0.93
26 1991 1769 129.1 -0.51 -2.42 0.841 46.9% +151 +167 — 50.0% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1697 115.7 -1.61 -1.46 0.836 47.1% +125 +183 — 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1653 131.2 -1.73 -0.29 0.920 48.7% +76 +109 — 47.5% -0.29 7–10 (41%) 3–4 (43%) 94.5 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1768 148.4 -0.95 +2.28 0.999 49.9% +44 -65 +195 49.5% 0.00 9–3 (75%) 7–9 (44%) 103.5 -1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1680 121.0 -1.79 +2.24 1.010 50.1% +11 +25 — 41.5% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 165.2 -1.28 +0.49 0.939 48.9% -16 +94 -98 66.8% +1.13 113–55 (67%) 121–89 (58%) 105.7 -3.77 — 1666 132.5 -2.11 -0.97 0.909 48.2% -92 +56 — 42.2% -0.53 30–35 (46%) 20–30 (40%) 98.5 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.