H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Damir Keretic H2H: 4-0

Mats Wilander holds a 4–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1986 Italian Open round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Damir Keretic
GER Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mats Wilander #2 6-3 6-1 Damir Keretic #110 Match data May 15, 1986* R32 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Mats Wilander #3 6-3 4-6 6-4 Damir Keretic #114 Match data Jul 20, 1985* SF Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Mats Wilander #4 3-6 6-0 6-2 Damir Keretic Match data May 11, 1984* R16 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Mats Wilander #14 6-1 6-4 Damir Keretic Match data Sep 25, 1982* SF Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,263 526 203 72.2% 7 0 0 6 20 33
Damir Keretic #837 #58 35 1,741 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Damir Keretic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,247 2 13 — — — — — — —
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,179 3 16 1979 1–2 33.3% #400 1,496 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,097 4 19 1980 3–7 30.0% #239 1,477 0 0
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,055 4 21 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,476 0 0
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,084 4 26 1982 15–17 46.9% #69 1,618 0 0
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,180 7 32 1983 7–17 29.2% #86 1,528 0 0
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,928 7 32 1984 7–8 46.7% #143 1,574 0 0
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,897 7 33 1985 12–15 44.4% #85 1,595 0 0
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,769 7 33 1986 16–14 53.3% #68 1,687 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1987 13–15 46.4% #109 1,694 0 0
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,697 7 33 1988 7–17 29.2% #207 1,537 0 0
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,653 7 33 1989 3–2 60.0% #412 1,575 0 0
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,767 7 33 — — — — — — —
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,680 7 33 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mats Wilander Damir Keretic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 18 6 24 75.0% 34 4 38 89.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 39 2 41 95.1% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 14 2 16 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 7 1 8 87.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 13 4 17 76.5% 37 5 42 88.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1986 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 34 3 37 91.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1982 — — — — 12 15 27 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 1988 29 2 31 93.5% 17 3 20 85.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1989 8 5 13 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1990 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 71 257 72.4% 236 68 304 77.6% 45 16 61 73.8% 59 48 107 55.1% — 9 21 30 30.0% 66 82 148 44.6% 7 11 18 38.9% 5 6 11 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mats Wilander Damir Keretic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1497 120.5 — — — — — +36 — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1663 137.2 — — — — +15 -79 -104 54.2% +0.25 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 2020 162.4 — — — — -182 +108 -398 71.9% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) — -2.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2248 172.9 — — — — -208 +33 -287 78.3% +2.21 12–2 (86%) 12–11 (52%) — -4.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 2180 167.5 — — — — -83 +62 -105 71.0% +1.24 13–3 (81%) 18–6 (75%) — -3.48 1979 1496 100.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.34
20 1985 2098 165.1 — — — — -58 +153 -23 71.8% +1.45 13–6 (68%) 12–4 (75%) — -3.35 1980 1477 97.2 — — — — +53 +20 — 33.3% -1.17 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.39
21 1986 2055 160.6 — — — — +34 +96 +11 68.8% +1.29 8–3 (73%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.36 1981 1477 122.8 — — — — — +42 — 40.9% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.85
22 1987 2084 170.5 — — — — +5 +137 -68 73.2% +1.66 7–3 (70%) 13–11 (54%) — -4.55 1982 1618 125.5 — — — — — +10 -32 46.0% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 4–5 (44%) — +2.82
23 1988 2180 162.6 — — — — +45 +57 -195 77.7% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 15–8 (65%) — -1.42 1983 1528 123.9 — — — — -63 +44 — 39.3% -0.79 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.53
24 1989 1929 145.4 — — — — +51 +210 +61 63.3% +0.82 8–3 (73%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.07 1984 1574 127.4 — — — — — +56 -12 43.8% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.03
25 1990 1897 152.5 — — — — +39 +195 — 59.3% +0.72 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -2.18 1985 1596 124.5 — — — — — +29 -45 44.6% -0.34 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.43
26 1991 1769 129.1 -0.51 -2.42 0.841 46.9% +151 +167 — 50.0% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.37 1986 1688 134.4 — — — — -143 +52 — 48.1% -0.22 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.30
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1694 139.5 — — — — -177 +69 -181 47.8% -0.07 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.52
28 1993 1697 115.7 -1.61 -1.46 0.836 47.1% +125 +183 — 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.40 1988 1538 120.7 — — — — -47 +102 — 35.4% -0.81 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.37
29 1994 1653 131.2 -1.73 -0.29 0.920 48.7% +76 +109 — 47.5% -0.29 7–10 (41%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.64 1989 1576 113.3 — — — — -37 — — 52.9% +0.24 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.44
30 1995 1768 148.4 -0.95 +2.28 0.999 49.9% +44 -65 +195 49.5% 0.00 9–3 (75%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1680 121.0 -1.79 +2.24 1.010 50.1% +11 +25 — 41.5% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2263 165.2 -1.28 +0.49 0.939 48.9% -16 +94 -98 66.8% +1.13 113–55 (67%) 121–89 (58%) 105.7 -3.77 — 1741 133.5 — — — — -76 +45 -60 43.3% -0.44 34–35 (49%) 34–32 (52%) 105.0 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.