H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 2-0

Mats Wilander holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1994 Bordeaux third round 6-4 6-3.

SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 15, 1994* Bordeaux ATP 250 R32 Hard Mats Wilander #127 6-4 6-3 Diego Nargiso #91 Match data
Apr 27, 1989* Monte Carlo ATP 250 R32 Clay Mats Wilander #2 7-6 6-1 Diego Nargiso #116 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 1988 10–12 45.5% #90 1,621 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,590 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,618 0 0
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,603 0 0
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,596 0 0
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,525 0 0
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,530 0 0
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,528 0 0
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,524 0 0
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,612 0 0
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33