H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Fernando Luna H2H: 2-0

Mats Wilander holds a 2–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1987 Swedish Open round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Fernando Luna
ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mats Wilander #2 6-2 6-3 Fernando Luna #192 Match data Jul 31, 1987* R16 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Mats Wilander #18 6-3 6-1 6-0 Fernando Luna #71 Match data May 30, 1982* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,263 526 203 72.2% 7 0 0 6 20 33
Fernando Luna #723 #33 310 1,779 167 160 51.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Fernando Luna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,247 2 13 — — — — — — —
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,179 3 16 1977 1–1 50.0% #322 1,511 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,097 4 19 1978 2–2 50.0% #340 1,541 0 0
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,055 4 21 1979 5–9 35.7% #87 1,517 0 0
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,084 4 26 1980 18–13 58.1% #66 1,708 0 0
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,180 7 32 1981 17–15 53.1% #81 1,694 0 0
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,928 7 32 1982 23–18 56.1% #60 1,724 0 0
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,897 7 33 1983 19–13 59.4% #53 1,733 0 0
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,769 7 33 1984 12–14 46.2% #70 1,646 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1985 10–14 41.7% #111 1,620 0 0
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,697 7 33 1986 19–14 57.6% #52 1,690 0 0
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,653 7 33 1987 4–6 40.0% #261 1,644 0 0
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,767 7 33 1988 18–12 60.0% #59 1,705 0 0
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,680 7 33 1989 11–16 40.7% #135 1,566 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1990 8–10 44.4% #110 1,588 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #356 1,535 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mats Wilander Fernando Luna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 18 6 24 75.0% 34 4 38 89.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 39 2 41 95.1% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 14 2 16 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 7 1 8 87.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 13 4 17 76.5% 37 5 42 88.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1979 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 34 3 37 91.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1980 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 29 2 31 93.5% 17 3 20 85.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 8 5 13 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 — — — — 23 18 41 56.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1983 — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 — — — — 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 10 14 24 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 — — — — 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 — — — — 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 71 257 72.4% 236 68 304 77.6% 45 16 61 73.8% 59 48 107 55.1% — 0 1 1 0.0% 167 157 324 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mats Wilander Fernando Luna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1497 120.5 — — — — — +36 — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1663 137.2 — — — — +15 -79 -104 54.2% +0.25 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.2 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 2020 162.4 — — — — -182 +108 -398 71.9% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) 103.8 -2.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2248 172.9 — — — — -208 +33 -287 78.3% +2.21 12–2 (86%) 12–11 (52%) 106.4 -4.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 2180 167.5 — — — — -83 +62 -105 71.0% +1.24 13–3 (81%) 18–6 (75%) 111.5 -3.48 1977 1512 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — — — +0.06
20 1985 2098 165.1 — — — — -58 +153 -23 71.8% +1.45 13–6 (68%) 12–4 (75%) 101.3 -3.35 1978 1541 122.3 — — — — — +41 — 60.0% +1.10 0–2 — — -0.24
21 1986 2055 160.6 — — — — +34 +96 +11 68.8% +1.29 8–3 (73%) 9–6 (60%) 102.3 -1.36 1979 1517 119.6 — — — — — +31 — 43.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.7 +1.17
22 1987 2084 170.5 — — — — +5 +137 -68 73.2% +1.66 7–3 (70%) 13–11 (54%) 100.4 -4.55 1980 1708 148.6 — — — — — +22 — 54.3% +0.33 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 -1.05
23 1988 2180 162.6 — — — — +45 +57 -195 77.7% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 15–8 (65%) 107.0 -1.42 1981 1695 133.6 — — — — — +19 — 49.4% +0.10 10–6 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 98.7 +1.18
24 1989 1929 145.4 — — — — +51 +210 +61 63.3% +0.82 8–3 (73%) 10–8 (56%) 98.2 -0.07 1982 1725 145.1 — — — — — +18 — 52.7% +0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.9 -0.88
25 1990 1897 152.5 — — — — +39 +195 — 59.3% +0.72 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 -2.18 1983 1733 134.9 — — — — — +26 — 57.7% +0.86 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +2.65
26 1991 1769 129.1 -0.51 -2.42 0.841 46.9% +151 +167 — 50.0% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 -0.37 1984 1647 140.1 — — — — — +41 — 47.5% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -0.03
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1620 133.2 — — — — — +19 — 42.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.2 -1.21
28 1993 1697 115.7 -1.61 -1.46 0.836 47.1% +125 +183 — 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 -0.40 1986 1691 141.4 — — — — — +38 — 57.5% +0.71 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 +0.24
29 1994 1653 131.2 -1.73 -0.29 0.920 48.7% +76 +109 — 47.5% -0.29 7–10 (41%) 3–4 (43%) 94.5 -0.64 1987 1644 114.7 — — — — — +31 — 40.0% -1.10 — 1–0 — -0.15
30 1995 1768 148.4 -0.95 +2.28 0.999 49.9% +44 -65 +195 49.5% 0.00 9–3 (75%) 7–9 (44%) 103.5 -1.55 1988 1706 136.6 — — — — — +48 — 58.7% +0.56 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63
31 1996 1680 121.0 -1.79 +2.24 1.010 50.1% +11 +25 — 41.5% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.59 1989 1566 117.8 — — — — — +22 — 46.0% -0.14 2–5 (29%) 6–4 (60%) 96.1 +0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1588 130.6 — — — — — +37 — 43.9% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1536 93.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — — — 12.5% -2.88 0–1 1–1 — +0.23
Career — 2263 165.2 -1.28 +0.49 0.939 48.9% -16 +94 -98 66.8% +1.13 113–55 (67%) 121–89 (58%) 105.7 -3.77 — 1779 144.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — +29 — 50.7% +0.24 44–43 (51%) 32–47 (41%) 93.6 +0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.