H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC

Mats Wilander vs G. Vilas H2H: 6-1

Mats Wilander holds a 6–1 lead over G. Vilas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 6–1 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1985 Boston semifinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
G. Vilas
ARG Age 73 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 13, 1985* Boston ATP 250 SF Clay Mats Wilander #3 6-1 6-3 G. Vilas #57 Match data
May 4, 1985* Hamburg ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #4 6-3 6-0 G. Vilas #42 Match data
Apr 21, 1984* Monte Carlo ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #4 6-3 6-1 G. Vilas #14 Match data
Oct 9, 1983* Barcelona ATP 250 F Clay Mats Wilander #5 6-0 6-3 6-1 G. Vilas #10 Match data
Oct 10, 1982* Barcelona ATP 250 F Clay Mats Wilander #11 6-3 6-4 6-3 G. Vilas #4 Match data
Jun 7, 1982* Roland Garros Grand Slam F Clay Mats Wilander #12 1-6 7-6 6-0 6-4 G. Vilas #2 Match data
May 1, 1982* Madrid ATP 250 QF Clay G. Vilas #4 6-3 6-4 Mats Wilander #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
G. Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,338 898 282 76.1% 4 3 1 0 55 63

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander G. Vilas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,549 0 0
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,693 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,851 0 1
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1974 88–22 80.0% #5 2,171 0 8
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,129 0 13
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,079 0 19
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1977 128–15 89.5% #2 2,303 2 35
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,216 3 42
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1979 70–21 76.9% #6 2,087 4 46
27 — — — — — — — 1980 67–17 79.8% #4 2,050 4 50
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1981 64–16 80.0% #6 2,035 4 53
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,014 4 60
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,947 4 63
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,791 4 63
32 — — — — — — — 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,767 4 63
33 — — — — — — — 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 63
34 — — — — — — — 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,717 4 63
35 — — — — — — — 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 63
36 — — — — — — — 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 63
39 — — — — — — — 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 63