H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mats Wilander vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 0-3
Jacco Eltingh holds a 3–0 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1995 Wimbledon third round 7-6(5) 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jacco Eltingh | 7-6(5) 6-3 7-6(4) | Mats Wilander | Match data |
| May 17, 1995* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jacco Eltingh | 6-3 6-2 | Mats Wilander | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jacco Eltingh | 6-3 7-6(4) 6-4 | Mats Wilander | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mats Wilander | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |