H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mats Wilander vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 3-1

Mats Wilander holds a 3–1 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1985 Brussels third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 1985* Brussels ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mats Wilander #4 6-3 6-4 John Fitzgerald #38 Match data
Jun 22, 1983* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mats Wilander #7 6-4 6-1 4-6 6-7 6-4 John Fitzgerald #48 Match data
Jun 28, 1981* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass John Fitzgerald #81 6-0 4-6 6-2 6-2 Mats Wilander #283 Match data
May 13, 1981* Hamburg ATP 250 R64 Clay Mats Wilander #283 5-7 7-5 6-4 John Fitzgerald #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,857 230 221 51.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,470 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,522 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,696 0 2
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,790 0 4
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,786 0 5
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,665 0 5
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1988 36–19 65.5% #25 1,778 0 6
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,651 0 6
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,618 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,582 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,575 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,570 0 6