H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 4-0

Mats Wilander holds a 4–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1991 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 24, 1991* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mats Wilander #64 6-0 6-3 Mark Woodforde #77 Match data
Oct 3, 1990* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 R64 Hard Mats Wilander #68 6-3 6-4 Mark Woodforde #80 Match data
Sep 7, 1988* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mats Wilander #2 6-3 6-2 6-2 Mark Woodforde #36 Match data
Mar 19, 1988* Key Biscayne Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mats Wilander #2 7-6 6-2 6-1 Mark Woodforde #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 — — — — — — —
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4