H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Mats Wilander vs T. Champion H2H: 1-0
Mats Wilander holds a 1–0 lead over T. Champion in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1986 US Open second round 6-1 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mats Wilander | 6-1 7-5 6-4 | T. Champion | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
| T. Champion | #790 | #44 | 744 | 1,757 | 102 | 162 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mats Wilander | T. Champion | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #128 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #125 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #59 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 | 1991 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #48 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 | 1992 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 | 1993 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #266 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #191 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 | 1997 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |