H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 5-1

Mats Wilander holds a 5–1 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1987 Boston third round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Thomas Hogstedt
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 9, 1987* Boston ATP 250 R32 Clay Mats Wilander #2 6-2 7-5 Thomas Hogstedt #123 Match data
Jul 25, 1986* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Mats Wilander #2 6-4 6-2 Thomas Hogstedt #198 Match data
Aug 25, 1984* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mats Wilander #4 6-2 6-3 Thomas Hogstedt #77 Match data
Nov 4, 1982* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Mats Wilander #8 6-4 3-6 6-3 Thomas Hogstedt #240 Match data
Oct 16, 1982* Basel ATP 250 SF Hard Mats Wilander #7 6-1 7-5 Thomas Hogstedt #240 Match data
Aug 18, 1982* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Hogstedt #240 7-5 3-6 6-1 Mats Wilander #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Thomas Hogstedt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 1981 1–1 50.0% #549 1,538 0 0
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,588 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,508 0 1
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,521 0 1
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,613 0 1
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,509 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,518 0 1
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,547 0 1
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,530 0 1
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,546 0 1
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 — — — — — — —