H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Tomas Smid H2H: 6-3

Mats Wilander holds a 6–3 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 4–1 on clay, while Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1985 Geneva final 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 3
9 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 22, 1985* Geneva ATP 250 F Clay Tomas Smid #18 6-4 6-4 Mats Wilander #3 Match data
Jun 5, 1985* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mats Wilander #4 6-3 6-4 6-4 Tomas Smid #16 Match data
Apr 20, 1984* Monte Carlo ATP 250 R16 Clay Mats Wilander #4 6-3 6-3 Tomas Smid #12 Match data
Mar 8, 1984* Brussels ATP 250 R32 Carpet Tomas Smid #17 7-5 7-5 Mats Wilander #3 Match data
Nov 6, 1983* Stockholm ATP 250 F Hard Mats Wilander #5 6-1 7-5 Tomas Smid #23 Match data
Jan 29, 1983* Guaruja ATP 250 SF Hard Mats Wilander #7 6-1 6-4 Tomas Smid #23 Match data
Sep 26, 1982* Geneva ATP 250 F Clay Mats Wilander #14 7-5 4-6 6-4 Tomas Smid #23 Match data
May 23, 1982* Rome Masters 1000 QF Clay Mats Wilander #30 6-1 6-1 Tomas Smid #32 Match data
Mar 26, 1982* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tomas Smid #22 3-6 7-6 6-4 Mats Wilander #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,998 497 318 61.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 — — — — — — —
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 — — — — — — —
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1977 16–18 47.1% #67 1,637 0 0
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,870 0 2
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1980 45–21 68.2% #23 1,950 0 4
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1981 54–28 65.9% #28 1,864 0 5
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,901 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,902 0 9
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 9
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 10
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,721 0 10
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,729 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,656 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,537 0 10