H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Victor Pecci H2H: 4-0

Mats Wilander holds a 4–0 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1985 Monte Carlo fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Victor Pecci
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 5, 1985* Monte Carlo ATP 250 R16 Clay Mats Wilander #4 6-3 6-3 Victor Pecci #42 Match data
Oct 5, 1984* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Mats Wilander #4 7-6 4-6 10-8 Victor Pecci #32 Match data
Apr 16, 1983* Aix En Provence ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #5 6-3 6-2 Victor Pecci #49 Match data
Apr 9, 1983* Lisbon ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #6 6-4 6-2 Victor Pecci #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33
Victor Pecci #666 #9 0 2,085 354 244 59.2% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Victor Pecci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,468 0 0
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13 1974 2–4 33.3% #318 1,480 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16 1975 21–21 50.0% #55 1,701 0 0
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19 1976 46–29 61.3% #34 1,813 0 2
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21 1977 38–26 59.4% #39 1,777 0 2
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26 1978 30–24 55.6% #46 1,874 0 3
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32 1979 56–19 74.7% #11 1,991 0 6
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32 1980 37–20 64.9% #29 1,837 0 7
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33 1981 48–20 70.6% #16 1,820 0 9
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33 1982 19–19 50.0% #68 1,699 0 9
27 — — — — — — — 1983 18–15 54.5% #56 1,703 0 10
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33 1984 17–12 58.6% #38 1,774 0 10
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33 1985 12–19 38.7% #110 1,607 0 10
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33 1986 4–6 40.0% #140 1,577 0 10
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33 1987 6–8 42.9% #256 1,545 0 10