H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Mats Wilander vs Vijay Amritraj H2H: 1-0

Mats Wilander holds a 1–0 lead over Vijay Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1985 US Open round of 128 6-2 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mats Wilander
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Vijay Amritraj
IND Age 72 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mats Wilander #3 6-2 6-4 6-4 Vijay Amritraj #56 Match data Aug 29, 1985* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,263 526 203 72.2% 7 0 0 6 20 33
Vijay Amritraj #1,178 #18 69 2,008 387 294 56.8% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mats Wilander Vijay Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,663 0 0 1970 1–2 33.3% — 1,508 0 0
17 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
18 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,247 2 13 1972 9–13 40.9% — 1,503 0 0
19 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,179 3 16 1973 33–15 68.8% #30 1,797 0 2
20 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,097 4 19 1974 48–28 63.2% #39 1,812 0 4
21 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,055 4 21 1975 39–23 62.9% #29 1,932 0 6
22 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,084 4 26 1976 29–20 59.2% #31 1,829 0 8
23 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,180 7 32 1977 25–22 53.2% #51 1,795 0 10
24 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,928 7 32 1978 16–14 53.3% #58 1,764 0 11
25 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,897 7 33 1979 34–23 59.6% #34 1,825 0 12
26 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,769 7 33 1980 49–24 67.1% #19 1,984 0 14
27 — — — — — — — 1981 31–21 59.6% #20 1,906 0 14
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,697 7 33 1982 12–12 50.0% #88 1,845 0 14
29 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,653 7 33 1983 8–12 40.0% #382 1,688 0 14
30 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,767 7 33 1984 19–18 51.4% #42 1,705 0 15
31 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,680 7 33 1985 11–16 40.7% #80 1,698 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1986 8–7 53.3% #106 1,686 0 16
33 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #221 1,676 0 16
34 — — — — — — — 1988 3–4 42.9% #193 1,654 0 16
35 — — — — — — — 1989 7–9 43.8% #280 1,603 0 16
36 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #687 1,539 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,525 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mats Wilander Vijay Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 18 6 24 75.0% 34 4 38 89.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1971 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 39 2 41 95.1% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 1972 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1984 14 2 16 87.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 7 1 8 87.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 1973 8 4 12 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — —
20 1985 13 4 17 76.5% 37 5 42 88.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1974 12 6 18 66.7% 17 11 28 60.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 8 16 50.0%
21 1986 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1975 16 8 24 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 34 3 37 91.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 16 9 25 64.0%
23 1988 29 2 31 93.5% 17 3 20 85.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 5 7 12 41.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 10 18 44.4%
24 1989 8 5 13 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 5 5 10 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 1990 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1979 11 7 18 61.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 7 14 50.0%
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 24 11 35 68.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 11 29 62.1%
28 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 9 18 50.0%
29 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 5 8 37.5%
31 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 71 257 72.4% 236 68 304 77.6% 45 16 61 73.8% 59 48 107 55.1% — 107 92 199 53.8% 79 58 137 57.7% 91 47 138 65.9% 110 97 207 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mats Wilander Vijay Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1497 120.5 — — — — — +36 — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1663 137.2 — — — — +15 -79 -104 54.2% +0.25 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.23 1970 1509 106.4 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.25
17 1982 2020 162.4 — — — — -182 +108 -398 71.9% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) — -2.88 1971 1497 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01
18 1983 2248 172.9 — — — — -208 +33 -287 78.3% +2.21 12–2 (86%) 12–11 (52%) — -4.52 1972 1504 114.1 — — — — +49 -2 +64 42.9% -0.66 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.14
19 1984 2180 167.5 — — — — -83 +62 -105 71.0% +1.24 13–3 (81%) 18–6 (75%) — -3.48 1973 1797 131.1 — — — — -110 -162 +49 61.2% +0.61 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) — +3.57
20 1985 2098 165.1 — — — — -58 +153 -23 71.8% +1.45 13–6 (68%) 12–4 (75%) — -3.35 1974 1812 134.0 — — — — -41 -90 +173 58.6% +0.46 13–10 (57%) 7–13 (35%) — +6.24
21 1986 2055 160.6 — — — — +34 +96 +11 68.8% +1.29 8–3 (73%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.36 1975 1933 144.4 — — — — -84 -40 +10 59.6% +0.47 11–12 (48%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.14
22 1987 2084 170.5 — — — — +5 +137 -68 73.2% +1.66 7–3 (70%) 13–11 (54%) — -4.55 1976 1829 141.8 — — — — +63 -70 +140 54.0% +0.27 15–6 (71%) 12–10 (55%) — +0.17
23 1988 2180 162.6 — — — — +45 +57 -195 77.7% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 15–8 (65%) — -1.42 1977 1796 141.3 — — — — +5 -37 +185 51.7% +0.16 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.73
24 1989 1929 145.4 — — — — +51 +210 +61 63.3% +0.82 8–3 (73%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.07 1978 1764 133.6 — — — — -2 +34 +158 58.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +1.67
25 1990 1897 152.5 — — — — +39 +195 — 59.3% +0.72 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -2.18 1979 1826 146.5 — — — — -7 +14 +116 59.0% +0.58 9–10 (47%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.08
26 1991 1769 129.1 -0.51 -2.42 0.841 46.9% +151 +167 — 50.0% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.37 1980 1985 166.0 — — — — +51 -160 +19 62.8% +0.87 15–8 (65%) 11–6 (65%) — -5.35
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1907 155.3 — — — — +12 -107 +116 59.3% +0.72 9–12 (43%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.64
28 1993 1697 115.7 -1.61 -1.46 0.836 47.1% +125 +183 — 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.40 1982 1846 138.7 — — — — -14 -68 +156 48.4% -0.08 4–2 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.51
29 1994 1653 131.2 -1.73 -0.29 0.920 48.7% +76 +109 — 47.5% -0.29 7–10 (41%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.64 1983 1688 117.1 — — — — +95 — +193 41.3% -0.61 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.58
30 1995 1768 148.4 -0.95 +2.28 0.999 49.9% +44 -65 +195 49.5% 0.00 9–3 (75%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.55 1984 1706 138.8 — — — — +44 +31 +152 50.5% -0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.28
31 1996 1680 121.0 -1.79 +2.24 1.010 50.1% +11 +25 — 41.5% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.59 1985 1699 135.9 — — — — -25 — +144 41.5% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 9–4 (69%) — -1.74
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1686 122.0 — — — — -42 — +156 54.1% +0.22 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.37
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1677 110.4 — — — — -14 — +90 46.2% -0.54 1–1 0–2 — -0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1654 114.6 — — — — -50 — +127 47.4% +0.05 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.08
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1603 112.0 — — — — +12 — +138 45.7% -0.54 1–2 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1540 97.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.12 0–2 — — +0.50
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1526 96.4 +0.56 -4.74 0.754 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.08
Career — 2263 165.2 -1.28 +0.49 0.939 48.9% -16 +94 -98 66.8% +1.13 113–55 (67%) 121–89 (58%) 105.7 -3.77 — 2008 147.0 +0.56 -4.74 0.754 43.0% +2 -63 +113 55.0% +0.28 127–107 (54%) 114–107 (52%) 103.5 +0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.