Mats Wilander
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 11 | 9 | 20 | Jul 27, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 6 | 13 | 19 | May 13, 1994 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 12 | 1 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Jan Gunnarsson | 9 | 2 | 11 | Mar 7, 1990 | H2H |
| John McEnroe | 6 | 5 | 11 | Jul 7, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Mats Wilander holds a 6–5 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 4–3 on clay, while Yannick Noah leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1988 Miami Open semifinal 6-4 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 6-4 6-4 6-3 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Mar 20, 1988* | SF | Miami Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Mats Wilander | 6-4 6-3 6-2 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Jun 5, 1987* | QF | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Yannick Noah | 6-4 6-2 4-6 2-6 7-6 | Mats Wilander | Match data | Mar 1, 1987* | QF | Miami Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Yannick Noah | 4-6 7-6 6-3 | Mats Wilander | Match data | Apr 26, 1986* | SF | Monte-Carlo Masters | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Mats Wilander | 7-6 2-6 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Jun 8, 1984* | QF | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Mats Wilander | 6-2 6-3 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Apr 21, 1984* | SF | Monte-Carlo Masters | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Yannick Noah | 6-2 7-5 7-6 | Mats Wilander | Match data | Jun 6, 1983* | F | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Yannick Noah | 6-4 6-4 | Mats Wilander | Match data | May 14, 1983* | QF | Hamburg Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Mats Wilander | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Apr 10, 1983* | F | Lisbon | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Mats Wilander | 6-3 6-2 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Mar 12, 1983* | QF | Brussels | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Yannick Noah | 6-4 6-2 6-3 | Mats Wilander | Match data | Oct 17, 1982* | F | Swiss Indoors | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,263 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 33 |
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,199 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 23 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mats Wilander | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,247 | 2 | 13 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,179 | 3 | 16 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,097 | 4 | 19 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,055 | 4 | 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,084 | 4 | 26 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,086 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,180 | 7 | 32 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,087 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,928 | 7 | 32 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,997 | 1 | 14 |
| 25 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,897 | 7 | 33 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,956 | 1 | 17 |
| 26 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,769 | 7 | 33 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 2,012 | 1 | 19 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,951 | 1 | 21 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,697 | 7 | 33 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,948 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,653 | 7 | 33 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,876 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,708 | 1 | 23 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,680 | 7 | 33 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,708 | 1 | 23 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,686 | 1 | 23 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,672 | 1 | 23 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mats Wilander | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 34 | 4 | 38 | 89.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 19 | 3 | 22 | 86.4% | 39 | 2 | 41 | 95.1% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1978 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 19 | 1984 | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1979 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1985 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 37 | 5 | 42 | 88.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1980 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 21 | 1986 | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1981 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% |
| 22 | 1987 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 34 | 3 | 37 | 91.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1982 | 19 | 1 | 20 | 95.0% | 29 | 7 | 36 | 80.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1988 | 29 | 2 | 31 | 93.5% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1983 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 23 | 2 | 25 | 92.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 24 | 1989 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1984 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 1990 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1985 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% |
| 26 | 1991 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | — | — | — | — | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13 | 2 | 15 | 86.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% |
| 28 | 1993 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% |
| 29 | 1994 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 30 | 1995 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1990 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 1996 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 186 | 71 | 257 | 72.4% | 236 | 68 | 304 | 77.6% | 45 | 16 | 61 | 73.8% | 59 | 48 | 107 | 55.1% | — | 164 | 62 | 226 | 72.6% | 202 | 66 | 268 | 75.4% | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | 79 | 50 | 129 | 61.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 107/123 of Mats Wilander's and 18/19 of Yannick Noah's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mats Wilander | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 26 | 1991 | 17/19 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 62.5% | 65.8% | 50.4% | 54.4% | 45.3% | 59.1% | 34.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 9/10 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 61.1% | 66.0% | 43.5% | 61.7% | 36.3% | 57.4% | 35.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 30/37 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 64.0% | 65.9% | 46.2% | 55.9% | 51.7% | 58.7% | 38.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 35/39 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 68.9% | 66.4% | 45.9% | 56.2% | 48.2% | 60.0% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 16/18 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 62.9% | 66.9% | 46.6% | 58.3% | 39.9% | 59.4% | 41.1% | 1991 | 13/14 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 55.5% | 68.0% | 44.8% | 62.6% | 47.2% | 57.6% | 36.6% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 77.9% | 47.6% | 45.5% | 20.0% | 64.1% | 29.2% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 60.5% | 69.2% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 61.6% | 19.4% |
| Career | — | 107/729 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 65.0% | 66.2% | 46.6% | 56.6% | 46.5% | 59.2% | 38.3% | — | 18/650 | 4.6 | 3.1 | 55.8% | 70.2% | 45.7% | 58.1% | 44.1% | 59.2% | 34.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mats Wilander | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1497 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 1663 | 137.2 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -79 | -104 | 54.2% | +0.25 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 2020 | 162.4 | — | — | — | — | -182 | +108 | -398 | 71.9% | +1.39 | 11–7 (61%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -2.88 | 1977 | 1491 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.08 |
| 18 | 1983 | 2248 | 172.9 | — | — | — | — | -208 | +33 | -287 | 78.3% | +2.21 | 12–2 (86%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | -4.52 | 1978 | 1709 | 137.9 | — | — | — | — | -111 | +56 | -173 | 57.7% | +0.42 | 7–5 (58%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | +3.56 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2180 | 167.5 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +62 | -105 | 71.0% | +1.24 | 13–3 (81%) | 18–6 (75%) | — | -3.48 | 1979 | 1933 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | -105 | +27 | -371 | 65.1% | +1.08 | 9–4 (69%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | +0.67 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2098 | 165.1 | — | — | — | — | -58 | +153 | -23 | 71.8% | +1.45 | 13–6 (68%) | 12–4 (75%) | — | -3.35 | 1980 | 1890 | 153.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +91 | -340 | 59.5% | +0.98 | 9–6 (60%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -3.05 |
| 21 | 1986 | 2055 | 160.6 | — | — | — | — | +34 | +96 | +11 | 68.8% | +1.29 | 8–3 (73%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -1.36 | 1981 | 1917 | 156.5 | — | — | — | — | +62 | +116 | -384 | 64.4% | +1.04 | 17–4 (81%) | 9–12 (43%) | — | -1.67 |
| 22 | 1987 | 2084 | 170.5 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +137 | -68 | 73.2% | +1.66 | 7–3 (70%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | -4.55 | 1982 | 2086 | 164.7 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +30 | — | 74.0% | +1.55 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -3.56 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2180 | 162.6 | — | — | — | — | +45 | +57 | -195 | 77.7% | +1.76 | 12–2 (86%) | 15–8 (65%) | — | -1.42 | 1983 | 2087 | 162.3 | — | — | — | — | -135 | +184 | — | 74.8% | +1.72 | 7–6 (54%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | -1.85 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1929 | 145.4 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +210 | +61 | 63.3% | +0.82 | 8–3 (73%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | -0.07 | 1984 | 1998 | 159.6 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +206 | — | 65.9% | +0.83 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–3 (75%) | — | -2.14 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1897 | 152.5 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +195 | — | 59.3% | +0.72 | 6–3 (67%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -2.18 | 1985 | 1957 | 156.2 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +205 | -368 | 68.4% | +1.11 | 12–6 (67%) | 18–12 (60%) | — | -0.87 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1769 | 129.1 | -0.51 | -2.42 | 0.841 | 46.9% | +151 | +167 | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -0.37 | 1986 | 2013 | 163.9 | — | — | — | — | -41 | +208 | — | 67.8% | +1.19 | 13–5 (72%) | 12–17 (41%) | — | -2.21 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1951 | 147.7 | — | — | — | — | +93 | +140 | -296 | 65.0% | +1.00 | 11–4 (73%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | +1.55 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1697 | 115.7 | -1.61 | -1.46 | 0.836 | 47.1% | +125 | +183 | — | 37.0% | -0.93 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.40 | 1988 | 1949 | 153.8 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +116 | — | 67.2% | +1.03 | 12–4 (75%) | 15–11 (58%) | — | -0.74 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1653 | 131.2 | -1.73 | -0.29 | 0.920 | 48.7% | +76 | +109 | — | 47.5% | -0.29 | 7–10 (41%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | -0.64 | 1989 | 1877 | 147.3 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 56.2% | +0.40 | 10–4 (71%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -0.89 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1768 | 148.4 | -0.95 | +2.28 | 0.999 | 49.9% | +44 | -65 | +195 | 49.5% | 0.00 | 9–3 (75%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | -1.55 | 1990 | 1708 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | +109 | +162 | — | 49.1% | -0.16 | 8–6 (57%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -1.00 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1680 | 121.0 | -1.79 | +2.24 | 1.010 | 50.1% | +11 | +25 | — | 41.5% | -0.32 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.59 | 1991 | 1709 | 127.3 | -0.35 | -2.54 | 0.863 | 47.8% | +60 | +151 | — | 48.5% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | -0.03 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1686 | 117.0 | -0.18 | -0.05 | 0.814 | 46.1% | +61 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.38 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.54 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1672 | 104.2 | -2.25 | +2.64 | 0.506 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| Career | — | 2263 | 165.2 | -1.28 | +0.49 | 0.939 | 48.9% | -16 | +94 | -98 | 66.8% | +1.13 | 113–55 (67%) | 121–89 (58%) | 105.7 | -3.77 | — | 2199 | 161.2 | -0.42 | -1.70 | 0.835 | 47.2% | +9 | +121 | -314 | 64.2% | +0.93 | 138–68 (67%) | 139–119 (54%) | 101.7 | -2.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 11 | 9 | 20 | Jul 27, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 6 | 13 | 19 | May 13, 1994 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 12 | 1 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Jan Gunnarsson | 9 | 2 | 11 | Mar 7, 1990 | H2H |
| John McEnroe | 6 | 5 | 11 | Jul 7, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 6 | 10 | 16 | Jan 28, 1990 | H2H |
| Tomas Smid | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 5 | 6 | 11 | Mar 20, 1988 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 7 | 2 | 9 | Feb 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 7 | 9 | May 11, 1986 | H2H |