H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Matt Anger vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 1-1
Matt Anger and Dan Cassidy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dan Cassidy leads 1–0 on grass, while Matt Anger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matt Anger won the 1986 La Quinta second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1986* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Matt Anger | 6-4 6-1 | Dan Cassidy | Match data |
| Dec 29, 1984* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Dan Cassidy | 6-4 7-5 | Matt Anger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Anger | #1,115 | #23 | 74 | 1,816 | 82 | 106 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matt Anger | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #289 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #229 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #91 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #351 | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,402 | 0 | 1 |