H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 3-1
Matteo Berrettini holds a 3–1 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Matteo Berrettini leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2021 Wimbledon third round 6-4 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Matteo Berrettini | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Matteo Berrettini | 3-6 6-3 6-2 7-6(3) | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2019* | Budapest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Matteo Berrettini | 7-6(8) 6-2 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2018* | Budapest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |