H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 3-0
Matteo Berrettini holds a 3–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Matteo Berrettini leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2024 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2024* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Matteo Berrettini | 6-3 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2022* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Matteo Berrettini | 6-4 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Matteo Berrettini | 6-3 6-4 7-6(4) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |