H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Denis Istomin H2H: 2-0
Matteo Berrettini holds a 2–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Matteo Berrettini leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2019 Munich third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2019* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Matteo Berrettini | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2019* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Matteo Berrettini | 6-4 7-6(7) | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |