H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Mikhail Kukushkin H2H: 1-0
Matteo Berrettini holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Kukushkin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matteo Berrettini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2019 Budapest third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019* | Budapest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Matteo Berrettini | 6-4 6-4 | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Mikhail Kukushkin | 7-5 6-4 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Mikhail Kukushkin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |