H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Mikhail Youzhny
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Matteo Berrettini vs Mikhail Youzhny.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |