H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Nicolas Jarry H2H: 1-1
Matteo Berrettini and Nicolas Jarry are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Jarry leads 1–0 on clay, while Matteo Berrettini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2022 US Open first round 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Matteo Berrettini | 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2018* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Nicolas Jarry | 7-5 6-3 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Nicolas Jarry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |