H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Radu Albot H2H: 3-0
Matteo Berrettini holds a 3–0 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Matteo Berrettini leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2022 Stuttgart fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2022* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Matteo Berrettini | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2018* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Matteo Berrettini | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2018* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Matteo Berrettini | 6-4 6-2 | Radu Albot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Radu Albot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |