H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maurice Ruah vs David Rikl H2H: 1-1
Maurice Ruah and David Rikl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maurice Ruah leads 1–0 on clay, while David Rikl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maurice Ruah won the 1994 Mexico City quarterfinal 7-6(3) 7-6(0).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1994* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Maurice Ruah | 7-6(3) 7-6(0) | David Rikl | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1994* | Jakarta | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | David Rikl | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Maurice Ruah | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maurice Ruah | #1,345 | #90 | 479 | 1,577 | 20 | 38 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maurice Ruah | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |