H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
M. Ruah vs L. Lavalle H2H: 1-0
M. Ruah holds a 1–0 lead over L. Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Ruah leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, M. Ruah won the 1994 Mexico City third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1994* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | M. Ruah | 6-3 6-2 | L. Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Ruah | #1,345 | #90 | 479 | 1,577 | 20 | 38 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| L. Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | M. Ruah | L. Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |