H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Maurice Ruah holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maurice Ruah leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maurice Ruah won the 1994 Mexican Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maurice Ruah | 6-3 6-2 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data | Feb 24, 1994* | R32 | Mexican Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maurice Ruah | #1,345 | #90 | 479 | 1,578 | 20 | 38 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 64 | 98 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maurice Ruah | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #99 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maurice Ruah | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1991 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 21 | 1992 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 1994 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1991 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 14 | 22 | 36 | 38.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 22 | 29 | 51 | 43.1% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 50/54 of Maurice Ruah's and 45/57 of Leonardo Lavalle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Maurice Ruah | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1991 | 7/7 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 59.4% | 66.1% | 49.6% | 60.9% | 49.2% | 59.1% | 38.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 57.3% | 58.6% | 54.7% | 45.0% | 42.2% | 57.0% | 39.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 54.6% | 73.0% | 42.6% | 50.6% | 30.6% | 59.0% | 36.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 32/36 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 56.1% | 65.5% | 47.8% | 49.1% | 37.6% | 57.6% | 35.8% | 1991 | 5/8 | 8.4 | 1.8 | 69.1% | 72.3% | 55.8% | 68.2% | 35.6% | 67.3% | 33.4% |
| 24 | 1995 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 58.6% | 61.8% | 41.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 53.4% | 35.0% | 1992 | 22/26 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 62.6% | 68.3% | 49.6% | 50.5% | 37.5% | 61.5% | 35.2% |
| 25 | 1996 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 64.7% | 45.5% | 44.4% | 58.3% | 20.0% | 45.1% | 38.3% | 1993 | 10/13 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 58.3% | 63.5% | 43.6% | 51.7% | 46.9% | 54.7% | 35.9% |
| 26 | 1997 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 53.8% | 65.3% | 45.2% | 73.3% | 100.0% | 56.0% | 36.0% | 1994 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 68.5% | 56.6% | 36.0% | 33.9% | 49.0% | 50.2% | 39.1% |
| 27 | 1998 | 3/3 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 61.1% | 68.9% | 49.1% | 67.3% | 28.8% | 61.5% | 38.7% | 1995 | 2/3 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 51.2% | 72.1% | 40.7% | 43.8% | 45.0% | 56.9% | 41.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1/2 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 62.5% | 61.8% | 30.3% | 68.8% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 41.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 59.5% | 66.7% | 46.9% | 78.6% | 60.0% | 58.7% | 33.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 69.1% | 66.0% | 50.7% | 61.3% | 31.0% | 61.0% | 41.1% |
| Career | — | 50/58 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 57.0% | 65.5% | 47.9% | 52.5% | 39.6% | 57.7% | 36.5% | — | 45/162 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 62.3% | 67.1% | 47.5% | 53.2% | 40.6% | 59.6% | 36.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maurice Ruah | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1558 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -9 | — | 44.0% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.29 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1488 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 1986 | 1588 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -11 | — | 37.5% | -1.03 | 7–5 (58%) | 5–2 (71%) | 106.3 | -1.10 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1521 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.83 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.17 | 1987 | 1531 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +31 | +34 | — | 29.6% | -1.04 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -0.54 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1501 | 105.1 | -0.55 | +0.28 | 0.932 | 49.3% | +35 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.28 | 1988 | 1654 | 137.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -94 | — | 41.5% | -0.51 | 4–2 (67%) | 3–3 (50%) | 105.5 | -0.81 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1519 | 109.5 | -2.16 | +0.10 | 0.911 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.16 | 1989 | 1649 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -56 | — | 47.0% | -0.28 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–4 (60%) | 99.7 | -0.27 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1511 | 97.5 | -3.66 | -0.12 | 0.899 | 47.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.12 | 1990 | 1596 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -11 | — | 42.4% | -0.52 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.1 | +0.85 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1471 | 109.6 | -3.17 | -2.30 | 0.844 | 46.4% | +20 | +56 | +43 | 35.2% | -1.05 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.2 | +2.78 | 1991 | 1658 | 122.7 | +0.15 | -1.21 | 1.022 | 50.1% | +34 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.05 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–3 (40%) | 104.1 | -0.14 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1465 | 102.0 | -0.78 | -0.85 | 0.752 | 44.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 | 1992 | 1646 | 122.6 | -0.34 | -1.80 | 0.915 | 48.1% | -19 | -9 | -164 | 45.7% | -0.40 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 95.2 | -0.27 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1455 | 95.4 | -2.32 | -3.28 | 0.698 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 1993 | 1596 | 111.1 | -2.52 | -2.49 | 0.792 | 45.9% | +5 | -12 | — | 25.8% | -1.45 | 4–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | -0.61 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1449 | 102.9 | +0.85 | -1.35 | 0.819 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 | 1994 | 1568 | 101.6 | -2.71 | -1.42 | 0.785 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 27 | 1998 | 1482 | 108.1 | -0.34 | -0.29 | 1.004 | 51.3% | +36 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | 1995 | 1566 | 110.6 | +3.66 | +0.68 | 0.964 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.25 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1570 | 108.2 | +1.19 | -1.53 | 0.827 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1562 | 106.7 | +1.45 | -0.38 | 0.815 | 47.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1570 | 108.2 | +2.32 | -0.20 | 1.053 | 50.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.06 |
| Career | — | 1578 | 109.9 | -2.48 | -1.56 | 0.865 | 47.1% | +25 | +56 | +43 | 36.9% | -0.93 | 7–10 (41%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.1 | +5.91 | — | 1729 | 132.9 | -0.51 | -1.65 | 0.890 | 47.8% | +14 | -24 | -164 | 40.7% | -0.61 | 28–26 (52%) | 24–29 (45%) | 102.3 | -2.18 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Cristiano Caratti | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Stefano Pescosolido | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Jeremy Bates | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 31, 1994 | H2H |
| David Rikl | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 26, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 14, 1993 | H2H |
| Christo Van Rensburg | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 4, 1992 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jan 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Bryan Shelton | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 29, 1993 | H2H |