H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Maurice Ruah vs Mark Petchey H2H: 0-1
Mark Petchey holds a 1–0 lead over Maurice Ruah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Petchey leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Petchey won the 1994 Queen's Club second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1994* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Mark Petchey | 6-2 7-5 | Maurice Ruah | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maurice Ruah | #1,345 | #90 | 479 | 1,577 | 20 | 38 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maurice Ruah | Mark Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |