H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Max Mirnyi vs Hugo Armando H2H: 0-1
Hugo Armando holds a 1–0 lead over Max Mirnyi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hugo Armando leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hugo Armando won the 2004 Delray Beach third round 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hugo Armando | 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hugo Armando | #1,126 | #100 | 403 | 1,581 | 13 | 30 | 30.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Max Mirnyi | Hugo Armando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #161 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #458 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |